Auto white balance software

For the sake of production time a fixed WB is the way to go. Landscape is largely artistic preferences anyhow, as I actually preferred all the AWB in the examples than k. That is the beauty of photography I think the biggest misconception with white balance and one that I rarely see discussed is the idea that white should always be white.

Light has a color and in many cases you should embrace it, not cancel it out. I think this is especially true for almost any photo taken outdoors, where the environment is part of the image. One of the characteristics of the environment, at any given time, is the color temperature of the light. But the inaccuracy is the other way around: white WILL appear to be warmer or cooler based on the ambient light temperature, and if you want to capture the atmosphere of the scene you want to embrace that concept, not avoid it.

Regarding AWB, I find that generally speaking it does well in the middle of the spectrum i. For me, proper white balance is all about setting an ideal and consistent baseline for your editing process. Most final images actually end up with wildly inaccurate white balance to capture a particular feel, but having a neutral canvas to work from just makes it a lot easier to achieve the look you want.

I always use AWB. There again, I don't shoot in JPG. Does that make me a bad photographer now? A fixed white balance most all the time. I do a lot of indoor work and bracket some shots and I want that WB to stay the same in every shot.

The only time I use Auto WB is when I am doing volunteer work at my local animal shelter doing portrait work. Things at the shelter change so rapidly I want to be able to shoot quickly. So far it has worked out well Auto WB at the shelter, I mean, not anywhere else. I shoot a lot of things that need to be pretty darn close to the correct color. Since I will be tweaking the files anyway to match the product color samples I go with AWB rather than Sunny, cloudy or shade, etc.

Using LR or C1 color correcting a batch of files is pretty easy. It really depends on where one is; sub-tropical, temperate, arctic? Sea level, m, 3,m? Mid-day, sunrise, sunset? In Mandeville, Jamaica, at high noon, 5,K is hardly daylight. Perfect for mixed lighting scenarios. I did notice daylight setting can be different on other cameras. I also noticed K and K as the standard daylight setting. It is not about the exact number, but the be consequent throughout the series of photos, that make editing easier.

Why does anyone shoot in jpeg now? RAW is superior and gives greater flexibility. File sizes don't seem to be a consideration with modern large capacity memory cards.

If you apply a "no editing" policy upon yourself, that's fine, but beyond that it is rare you cannot make any time for editing, especially something as trivial as WB correction. Understanding WB is important, but I leave it at auto for the very reason that it always reminds me to check it in post. If I changed the WB all the time in the camera I might ignore it in post where I have a properly calibrated monitor.

I am much more likely to nail the colours in post on said monitor than I am reviewing it on the back LCD screen of my camera. Some people prefer jpeg above raw And that also answers your second question. I was trying to understand why. To be clear, I wasn't judging anyone. Raw or jpeg. Auto WB or manual WB. Priority shooting modes or full manual. I don't care. I never suggested you did. But I don't understand why it would make more sense to use AWB instead of manually input it I used to shoot dance schools during their annual shows.

I had very little time to shoot and had to sell during the break in the middle of the show. I developed a setup where I was shooting in a very controlled studio setting with perfect white balance and exposure in camera.

My camera was connected via wi-fi to a print server and images were printed 45 seconds after being taken to be available as quick as possible for selling. There are a LOT of different businesses possible with photography and some require to deliver ultra quickly.

JPEG in camera is a must in these situations. Yours sounds like a very specific example, and I am not sure why you'd have to sell during the breaks unless it was to create a sense of scarcity for customers to boost sales, which is a perfectly legitimate business tactic. I would imagine that your sales volume would drop off quite a bit if you sold such photos even a few hours removed from the show as it would be out of peoples' minds. If they didn't have a kiosk selling your roller coaster photos right at the exit, how many people do you think would go back onto a website and order such a photo?

Capturing the customer on-location removes a huge barrier which is getting the customer to take initiative. Roller Coaster example isn't relevant because the set up would be completely different and probably calibrated specifically for that exact scenario. Event photography is all about speed of delivery. Shootin JPEG in camera streamlines lots of things for that. Particularly in today's society, where you have images and videos being shared in real-time, you often need to be able to reasonably keep pace.

Then why shoot both? Many times the photographer will submit that, but keep the RAW for publishing later or in less stringent places. I used to shoot quite a bit for the newspaper on extremely short deadlines, and they needed jpegs that were downscaled for quick loading on the web.

If they needed something for the front page, or there was an image I liked for my portfolio, I had the Raw to use, but I rarely ever needed anything but the Jpeg. Last month I shot a 5K for a local company and had to turn over Jpegs a half hour after the race so same deal, shot in Jpeg, culled through photo mechanic and turned in the shots.

In both cases I set the WB manually because I don't have time to go back and tweak inconsistencies in the photos. Very clear story. Thanks for sharing. And a good example of the benefit of shooting at a fixed WB setting. Hold on The user interface designed as a step-by-step wizard will allow you to process a huge quantity of images quickly and effectively. Full Specifications. What's new in version 1. Release November 6, Date Added November 6, Version 1.

Operating Systems. Additional Requirements. NET Framework 2. Total Downloads 1, Downloads Last Week 2. Report Software. Related Software. FotoSketcher Free.

Turn digital photos into drawings or paintings. VueScan Free to try. Get the most out of your scanner by improving its productivity and quality. BatchPhoto Free to try. Convert, resize, rename, and edit photos in batch mode; automate editing with profiles and scripts. This can be performed by using the Colorcheck module with an appropriate video file. This metric is intended to be used as a way to measure the time a camera system takes to auto white balance a scene.

Rise time and settling time are automatically calculated. This measurement does not provide information about the accuracy or precision of auto white balance. To evaluate those measures, several measurements should be performed on the final, settled images and compared.

Begin by clicking on Colorcheck from the main window and select a video file. Select the Plot metric with respect to time: Correlated color temperature option and select a range of frames that covers from incorrectly white balanced to balanced for at least seconds. Any shorter and you risk not having enough frames to ensure the AWB system has settled completely. For more details on supported video formats, see Image file formats and acquisition devices.

For more details on how to select Colorcheck regions, see Colorcheck.